Why cities fail to adopt micro-mobility even when infrastructure exists
Problem
Bike lanes exist but usage remains low. The infrastructure argument doesn't explain adoption gaps.
Hypothesis
The bottleneck is modal switching cost, not infrastructure. The first 200m from home to the bike lane is the actual barrier.
Weakness
This might be a density problem — only applies to certain urban configurations.
Next step
Map the actual door-to-lane distance for top 10 underperforming bike lane corridors.
Branch log
keptModal switching cost as primary barrier
rejectedInfrastructure deficit hypothesis — too many counterexamples
why it turnedFound Tokyo data: high bike lane coverage, low usage. Infrastructure alone isn't explanatory.
unresolvedHow much of this is weather, culture, vs. pure logistics?
Impact
→ triggered 1 connection
→ rediscovered 2 times
Connections
→ transfer
Fermented food knowledge transfer problem between generations
Both deal with adoption barriers in established systems
→ complete
Related tunnels
Fermented food knowledge transfer problem between generations
enGrandmothers hold the real fermentation knowledge. It doesn't get transferred because there's no structured way to capture tacit skill.
The 'overnight success' narrative destroys useful failure data
enStartup post-mortems are written after fundraising or acquisition. The real failure reasoning disappears.
医療AIの現地化問題：症状の語彙は文化で異なる
ja日本の患者が「だるい」「重い感じ」と表現する症状は、英語の医療訓練データに存在しない。
Regulatory sandboxes create knowledge islands, not transfer
enFinTech sandboxes in Singapore, UK, UAE operate with different rules. The learnings don't cross borders.